DSO Greetings and News
X
Greetings and News from the Disability Services Office brought to you by Cheryl Branker, Ed.D. Associate Vice Provost for Equal Opportunity & Equity and Director of Disability Compliance Programs
Information to Share
1. The Role of the DSO
AHEAD Standards & Performance Indicators
AHEAD Standards & Performance Indicators
2.Employees with Disabilities
ADA – Title I
Registration Process
Access and Barriers for Persons with Disabilities Survey Results Spring 2009
Access and Barriers for Persons with Disabilities Survey Results
Access and Barriers for Persons with Disabilities Survey Results
Access and Barriers for Persons with Disabilities Survey Results
Access and Barriers for Persons with Disabilities Survey Results
Access and Barriers for Persons with Disabilities Survey Results
Access and Barriers for Persons with Disabilities Survey Results
Access and Barriers for Persons with Disabilities Survey Results
If you have questions please contact me: cheryl_branker@ncsu.edu 513-3768 Thank You!
00:00
/
00:00
CC
Greetings
and
News
from
the
Disability
Services
Office
brought
to
you
by
Cheryl
Branker,
Ed.D.
Associate
Vice
Provost
for
Equal
Opportunity
&
Equity
and
Director
of
Disability
Compliance
Programs
CRB.jpg
Information
to
Share
The
role
of
the
DSO
2.
The
role
YOU
play
in
employee
accommodations
3.
Results
of
the
Access
&
Barriers
Survey
(2009)
1.
The
Role
of
the
DSO
Currently
resides
in
OEO
Is
committed
to
positive
action
to
secure
equal
opportunity
Ensures
the
University
is
in
compliance
with
the
ADA
Adheres
to
the
Professional
Standards
and
Performance
Indicators
of
the
AHEAD
AHEAD
Standards
&
Performance
Indicators
Consultation/Collaboration
Serve
as
an
advocate
for
issues
to
ensure
equal
access
Information
Dissemination
Disseminate
information
through
institutional
electronic
and
printed
publications
regarding
disability
services
and
how
to
access
them.
Disseminate
information
to
students
with
disabilities
regarding
available
campus/community
resources
AHEAD
Standards
&
Performance
Indicators
Faculty/Staff
Awareness
Inform
faculty
regarding
academic
accommodations,
compliance
with
legal
responsibilities,
as
well
as
instructional,
programmatic,
and
curriculum
modifications
Provide
consultation
with
administrators
Provide
disability
awareness
training
Provide
information
to
faculty
about
available
services
Academic
Adjustments
Maintain
records
that
document
the
student’s
plan
for
the
provision
of
selected
accommodations
Determine
with
students
appropriate
academic
accommodations
and
services
Collaborate
with
faculty
to
ensure
that
reasonable
academic
accommodations
do
not
fundamentally
alter
the
program
of
study
2.Employees
with
Disabilities
Title
I
of
the
ADA
of
1990
states
that
employment
practices
cannot
discriminate
against
a
qualified
individual
with
a
disability.
This
applies
to
all
aspects
of
employment,
including
job
advertisements,
job
applications,
job
interviews,
and
post-offer
medical
examinations.
6
ADA
–
Title
I
One
of
the
key
non-discrimination
requirements
of
Title
I
is
the
obligation
to
provide
reasonable
accommodation
for
employees
with
disabilities.
7
Registration
Process
Step
1:
Completes
Request
for
Eligibility
Review
Form
Step
2:
Submits
Documentation
of
Disability
Form
Step
3:
Schedule
an
appointment
to
meet
with
the
ADA
Coordinator
Step
4:
Meet
to
discuss
functional
limitations
and
restrictions,
essential
job
functions,
and
to
outline
accommodations
For
more
information,
go
to:
http://www.ncsu.edu/dso/employees/employee_registration_checklist.html
Access
and
Barriers
for
Persons
with
Disabilities
Survey
Results
Spring
2009
#3.
Cheryl
R.
Branker,
Ed.D
Associate
Vice
Provost
Title
Bar
&
Logo
Access
and
Barriers
for
Persons
with
Disabilities
Survey
Results
Purpose
to
ascertain
the
University’s
commitment
to
persons
with
disabilities
under
Section
504
and
the
ADA
by
looking
at
the
policies,
services,
procedures/practices,
and
programs
within
each
college/department/unit
Title
Bar
&
Logo
Access
and
Barriers
for
Persons
with
Disabilities
Survey
Results
Respondents
Fifty-two
percent
(52%
)
of
the
ninety-eight
(98)executive
officers,
deans,
academic
department
heads
and
vice
provosts
responded
Title
Bar
&
Logo
Access
and
Barriers
for
Persons
with
Disabilities
Survey
Results
Survey
questions
Nine
(9)
questions
classified
into
five
(5)
domains:
Efforts
that
provide/improve
access
Efforts
that
were
actual/potential
barriers
Marketing
materials
Mission
statement
Resources
needed
Title
Bar
&
Logo
Access
and
Barriers
for
Persons
with
Disabilities
Survey
Results
Key
findings
Access
was
related
to
general
attitude,
specific
responses
to
issues
of
inaccessibility,
deliberate
actions
to
be
more
inclusive
Barriers
were
related
to
limited
/no
consideration
of
functional
limitations,
designing/purchasing
processes
Universal
symbol
of
accessibility
displayed
25.5%
of
the
time;
accommodation
statement
45.1%;
pictures
of
persons
with
disabilities
23.5%
of
the
time
Title
Bar
&
Logo
Access
and
Barriers
for
Persons
with
Disabilities
Survey
Results
Key
findings
continued
Mission
statements
contained
specific
words/phrases
19.6%
of
the
time
Resources
to
help
prioritize
and
specify
barriers:
identification,
technical
assistance,
financial
assistance
Title
Bar
&
Logo
Access
and
Barriers
for
Persons
with
Disabilities
Survey
Results
Conclusions
Disability
–
(medical
model)
-
a
“problem”
that
exists
within
the
person
and
the
goal
is
to
“fix”
the
person
Disability
–
(socio-political
model)
–
the
systemic
mismatch
between
physical
&
mental
attributes
of
individuals
and
the
present
ability
of
social
institutions
to
accommodate
these
attributes.
Title
Bar
&
Logo
Access
and
Barriers
for
Persons
with
Disabilities
Survey
Results
Implementation
of
recommendations
Formally
adopt
the
guiding
principles
of
Universal
Design
Provide
resources
and
training
Develop
policies,
services,
practices
and
procedures
that
reflect
the
paradigm
shift
Develop
staff
/faculty
orientation
materials
which
promote
UD
Seek
input
from
persons
with
disabilities
to
examine
programmatic
accessibility
Title
Bar
&
Logo
If
you
have
questions
please
contact
me:
cheryl_branker@ncsu.edu
513-3768
Thank
You!
Title
Bar
&
Logo
Thank
you
for
clicking
on
the
link
in
your
email.
I’m
Cheryl
Branker,
Associate
Vice
Provost
for
Equal
Opportunity
and
Equity
and
Director
of
Disability
Compliance
Programs
here
at
NC
State.
I
hope
the
academic
year
was
a
good
one
for
you
and
your
department.
If
you
have
a
few
minutes,
I’d
like
to
share
information
with
you
regarding:
the
role
of
the
Disability
Services
Office
the
role
you
play
in
making
sure
faculty
and
staff
are
appropriately
accommodated
as
employees
with
disabilities
and
the
results
of
the
Access
and
Barriers
Survey
completed
in
the
spring
of
2009.
The
DSO
at
NC
State
is
currently
a
unit
of
the
Office
for
Equal
Opportunity
and
is
committed
to
positive
action
to
secure
equal
opportunity
for
all
faculty,
staff,
and
students.
At
a
glance,
the
DSO
has
the
responsibility
of
ensuring
that
the
University
is
in
compliance
with
the
Americans
with
Disabilities
Act
which
is
a
civil
rights
law
that
prohibits
discrimination
based
on
disability.
The
ADA
essentially
levels
the
playing
field
for
all
qualified
people,
disabled
or
not.
The
ADA
Amendments
Act,
which
was
signed
into
law
in
2008,
both
clarifies
and
significantly
expands
what
is
considered
a
“disability”
under
the
ADA.
The
result
of
the
Amendments
Act
is
that
millions
more
people
will
now
be
protected
under
the
ADA.
NC
State
is
obligated
to
adhere
to
Title
II
of
the
ADA
which
prohibits
discrimination
against
qualified
individuals
with
disabilities
in
all
of
its
programs,
activities,
and
services.
For
DSO,
the
operation
for
students
is
informed
by
the
Professional
Standards
and
Performance
Indicators
of
The
Association
on
Higher
Education
And
Disability,
of
which
NC
State
is
an
institutional
member.
These
standards
are
intended
to
enhance
service
provision
for
college
students
with
disabilities
by
directing
program
evaluation
and
development
efforts.
Today,
I’d
like
to
share
four
AHEAD
standards
and
performance
indicators
with
you.
These
four
outline
the
role
of
the
DSO
as
it
relates
to
the
workings
of
academic
departments.
To
facilitate
equal
access
to
postsecondary
education
for
students
with
disabilities,
the
DSO
should
serve
as
an
advocate
for
issues
regarding
students
with
disabilities
to
ensure
equal
access.
They
do
this
through
consultation
and
collaboration.
Secondly
the
DSO
should
be
involved
in
information
dissemination.
That
is,
the
DSO
should
disseminate
information
through
institutional
electronic
and
printed
publications
regarding
disability
services
and
how
to
access
them.
The
DSO
should
also
disseminate
information
to
students
with
disabilities
regarding
available
campus
and
community
resources
Indicator
3
is
faculty/staff
awareness.
The
Disability
Services
Office
should
inform
faculty
regarding
academic
accommodations,
compliance
with
legal
responsibilities,
as
well
as
instructional,
programmatic,
and
curriculum
modifications.
The
DSO
should
provide
consultation
with
administrators,
provide
disability
awareness
training
and
provide
information
to
faculty
about
available
services.
In
indicator
number
4,
the
Disability
Services
Office
is
engaged
in
academic
adjustments.
They
do
this
through
maintaining
records
that
document
the
student’s
plan
for
the
provision
of
selected
accommodations.
They
determine
with
students
appropriate
academic
accommodations
and
services.
And
they
collaborate
with
faculty
to
ensure
that
reasonable
academic
accommodations
do
not
fundamentally
alter
the
program
of
study.
NC
State
University
is
also
obligated
to
be
in
compliance
with
the
ADA
under
Title
I
which
states
that
employment
practices
cannot
discriminate
against
a
qualified
individual
with
a
disability.
So,
this
brings
me
to
the
second
topic
of
today’s
discussion
and
that
is
the
role
you
play
in
making
sure
faculty
and
staff,
which
includes
your
teaching/graduate
assistants,
are
appropriately
accommodated
as
persons
with
disabilities.
Under
Title
I,
employment
practices
cannot
discriminate
against
a
qualified
individual
with
a
disability
and
applies
to
all
aspects
of
employment,
including
job
advertisements,
job
applications,
job
interviews,
and
post-offer
medical
examinations.
One
of
the
key
non-discrimination
requirements
of
this
Title
is
the
obligation
to
provide
reasonable
accommodation
for
employees
with
disabilities.
The
registration
process
involves
four
steps.
In
Step
1,
the
employee
completes
the
Request
for
Eligibility
Review
Form.
In
Step
2,
the
employee
submits
a
Documentation
of
Disability
Form
.
If
documentation
substantiates
that
the
employee
is
a
person
with
a
disability,
he
or
she
will
be
registered
with
the
DSO
and
the
ADA
Coordinator
will
contact
the
employee.
In
Step
3,
the
employee
and
supervisor
will
schedule
an
appointment
to
meet
with
the
ADA
Coordinator
to
discuss
accommodations.
This
meeting
is
required
for
accommodations
to
begin.
In
the
final
step,
the
employee
will
meet
with
the
ADA
Coordinator
and
his/her
supervisor
to
discuss
functional
limitations
and
restrictions,
essential
job
functions
and
outline
accommodations
for
which
the
employee
is
eligible.
And
at
that
meeting,
an
Accommodations
Agreement
Form
will
be
completed
and
signed
by
all.
Hopefully,
the
information
shared
with
you
thus
far,
gives
you
an
idea
of
the
roles
DSO
and
academic
department
heads
play
in
keeping
our
university
in
compliance.
Now
the
third
topic,
the
Access
and
Barriers
Survey.
It
had
been
more
than
a
decade
since
the
university
last
completed
a
self-evaluation
of
its
programs,
services
and
activities,
as
outlined
under
the
provisions
of
Section
504
of
the
Rehabilitation
Act
and
the
ADA.
While
technological
advances
in
electronics
have
vastly
improved
and
increased
the
opportunities
for
people
with
disabilities
to
fully
participate
in
postsecondary
educational
activities,
the
University,
as
a
recipient
of
federal
funding,
is
nonetheless,
obligated
to
periodically
evaluate
its
policies
and
practices
with
regard
to
programmatic
accessibility
under
the
statutory
provisions
of
both
laws.
The
Office
for
Equal
Opportunity
conducted
the
Access
and
Barriers
for
Persons
with
Disabilities
Survey
in
the
spring
of
2009.
While
most
researchers
deploying
such
surveys
are
trying
to
identify
existing
physical
barriers
and
create
a
list
of
possible
solutions
to
remove
them,
this
survey
was
deployed
to
ascertain
the
University’s
commitment
to
persons
with
disabilities
under
Section
504
and
the
ADA
by
looking
at
the
policies,
services,
procedures/practices,
and
programs
within
each
college/department
or
unit
that
may
pose
barriers
and
those
that
provide
or
improve
access.
The
respondents
to
this
survey
included
98
university
executive
officers,
deans,
academic
department
heads
and
vice
provosts.
The
survey
yielded
a
52%
response
rate.
Detailed
information
came
from
9
questions
that
were
classified
into
5
domains:
List
any
policies,
services,
procedures/
practices,
programs
that
provide
or
improve
access.
List
any
policies,
services,
procedures/
practices,
programs
that
were
actual
or
potential
barriers.
Do
the
marketing
materials
of
your
college/
dept/unit.
Display
the
universal
symbol
of
accessibility,
Include
a
statement
about
accommodations,
Include
pictures
of
persons
with
disabilities?
Are
there
specific
words/phrases
in
your
mission
statement
that
indicate
your
willingness
to
include
persons
with
disabilities
What
resources
would
be
most
helpful
to
your
college/dept/unit
in
specifying
and
prioritizing
barriers
that
should
be
removed
or
modified
within
your
current
human
and
financial
resources
Key
findings:
Efforts
that
provided
or
improved
access
were
related
to
general
attitude
or
philosophy,
specific
responses
to
issues
of
inaccessibility
or
deliberate
actions
to
be
more
inclusive
Efforts
that
were
actual
or
potential
barriers
were
related
to
limited
or
no
consideration
of
person’s
functional
limitations
or
limited
or
no
consideration
in
the
designing/purchasing
processes.
With
regard
to
marketing
materials,
the
universal
symbol
of
accessibility
was
displayed
25%
of
the
time;
an
accommodation
statement
was
included
45%
of
the
time;
and
pictures
of
persons
with
disabilities
were
included
23%
of
the
time.
College/dept/unit
mission
statements
contained
specific
words/phrases
that
indicated
a
willingness
to
include
persons
with
disabilities
about
20%
of
the
time.
And
the
resources
needed
by
the
college/dept/unit
to
help
prioritize
and
specify
barriers
were
related
to
assistance
with
knowing
what
the
potential
barriers
are
or
might
be,
technical
assistance
(especially
for
the
web
sites),
and
financial
assistance.
These
findings
suggest
that
at
NC
State,
the
accommodation
model
has
been
the
primary
mode
of
viewing
and
relating
to
persons
with
disabilities.
With
this
view,
the
disability
is
a
“problem”
that
exists
within
the
person
and
the
goal
is
to
fix
the
person.
This
is
referred
to
as
the
medical
model.
For
the
past
20
years,
there’s
been
an
effort
to
create
a
paradigm
shift
to
a
socio-political
model
of
disability.
That
effort
was
begun
on
this
campus
in
1989
under
the
leadership
of
Ron
Mace
in
the
Center
for
Universal
Design.
With
this
view,
it
is
acknowledged
that
a
person
may
have
different
physical
and/or
mental
attributes
than
the
majority
of
persons,
however,
the
problem
of
inaccessibility
is
not
the
person’s
with
the
different
attributes,
it’s
society’s
problem,
the
institution’s
problem
for
not
designing
the
physical
space,
the
programs,
the
information,
in
such
a
way
that
accommodates
for
differences.
This
lack
of
society’s
awareness
and
intention,
then
impacts
our
attitudes
about
persons
with
different
physical
or
mental
attributes
which
then
limits
their
ability
to
participate
fully
in
what
it
is
we
have
to
offer.
To
gain
full
participation,
the
person
with
the
difference,
has
to
request
an
accommodation.
And
while
we
have
done
a
great
job
in
providing
those
requested,
we
have
only
provided
the
minimal
equal
access
as
required
by
law
on
a
case-by-case
basis.
This
service
construct
is
built
on
the
tenets
of
the
medical
model.
It’s
been
effective
in
most
cases
but
it
reinforces
a
“separate
but
equal”
system,
can
take
a
great
deal
of
time,
and
in
many
situations
is
not
inclusive,
it
can
be
costly
and
it
is
typically
not
sustainable,
and
it
limits
the
individual
from
participating
in
our
community
independently.
In
contrast,
the
socio-political
model
of
disability
promotes,
universal
design,
disability
pride,
self-determination,
and
independence
of
the
individual.
When
we
acknowledge
that
persons
with
disabilities
do,
and
will,
work
and
learn
on
our
campus,
then
we
will
all
need
to
participate
in
creating
a
welcoming
campus
environment.
The
act
of
designing
physical,
programmatic,
informational,
and
attitudinal
environments
should
center
on
making
intentional
and
reflective
choices
about
what
it
is
we
want
faculty,
staff,
and
students
to
experience
and
gain
while
here.
To
achieve
naturally
inclusive
and
barrier
free
learning,
working,
and
social
environments,
it
is
recommended
that
the
campus
undertake
the
following:
Formally
adopt
the
guiding
principles
of
Universal
Design
as
a
part
of
the
overall
campus
strategic
planning
and
compact
planning
processes
and
promote
such
on
key
web
pages.
Provide
resources
and
training
–
especially
training
related
to
course
design
&
web
design.
Develop
policies,
services,
practices
and
procedures
that
reflect
the
paradigm
shift.
Develop
staff
/faculty
orientation
materials
which
promote
Universal
Design
as
part
of
our
campus
culture
and
identify
best
practices.
Seek
input
from
persons
with
disabilities
always
to
examine
programmatic
accessibility.
If
the
mission
of
NC
State
is
to
“use
knowledge,
collaboration
and
creativity
to
impact
the
economic,
human,
environmental,
and
social
concerns
of
our
society,”
then
we
must
acknowledge
that
persons
with
disabilities
are
amongst
us
and
we
must
guarantee
their
participation
in
the
future
of
this
institution,
the
state,
the
nation
and
the
world.
If
you
have
questions,
please
send
them
to
me
by
email.
I
will
gather
them
and
provide
the
answers
in
a
document
that
will
then
be
emailed
out
to
everyone.
Thank
you
for
your
time
today
and
all
the
work
you
and
your
department
do
to
help
the
Disability
Services
Office
support
the
ongoing
development
of
a
balanced
university
environment
for
all.